top of page

When to Reshop Your Malpractice Insurance Policy (And When Not To)

  • 1 day ago
  • 7 min read

Medical malpractice insurance is one of the largest recurring business expenses many physicians carry, yet surprisingly few ever test whether their renewal still reflects the broader market. Reshopping a malpractice insurance policy is usually less burdensome than members of our online physician community may assume, but the right decision depends on much more than just the premium. Below, we cover instances where it can be worth reassessing your current malpractice policy, and considerations to consider beyond premium when comparing options.


This page's content was provided by our partners at Docshield. Docshield provides fast, transparent medical malpractice insurance quotes from market-leading carriers. With just NPI numbers, Docshield pre-fills the majority of your application and shops across carriers — saving their customers over 20% on average. Whether you're shopping for a large group practice or a moonlighting policy, Docshield's licensed experts can help you find the right coverage without the hassle. Get started with our partnership link.


Disclosure/Disclaimer: This page contains information about our sponsors and/or affiliate links, which support us monetarily at no cost to you. These should be viewed as introductions rather than formal recommendations. Our content is for generalized educational purposes. While we try to ensure it is accurate and updated, we cannot guarantee it. We are not formal financial, legal, or tax professionals and do not provide individualized advice specific to your situation. You should consult these as appropriate and/or do your own due diligence before making decisions based on this page. To learn more, visit our disclaimers and disclosures.


7 instances where you may want to reshop your medical malpractice insurance policy


How efficient is reshopping a malpractice insurance policy in practice?


Reshopping is a few hours of your time when the carrier landscape is being worked for you. Your broker pulls existing declarations and loss runs, runs your file past appointed carriers, and brings back comparable quotes. The friction sits with the broker, not with you. The more practiced the broker is at the workflow, the less it costs you in time and attention.


Related PSG resource:


What still requires your judgment, regardless of the broker efficiency’s is:

  • Deciding which trade-offs matter to you (premium versus coverage form versus continuity)

  • Reading the policy form before you bind

  • Deciding how aggressively to go back to your current carrier with a competing quote


Those are the parts a broker can frame but can't decide for you.


A few residual costs are worth naming so you can weigh them:


  • Discount-schedule reset. Most malpractice carriers apply some form of continuity credit (a step-rated schedule, a claims-free credit, or a longevity discount) that builds over years with the same carrier. Switching usually resets you to the new carrier's year-one position. The headline premium can be lower while the multi-year cost is higher, and a good broker will surface this in the comparison.


  • Free-tail vesting. If your current carrier offers a free tail at retirement with a tenure requirement (age 55 or older with 5+ years of continuous coverage is a common form), switching inside the qualifying window forfeits the benefit. This is the single most consequential continuity benefit, and it's why the re-shop question becomes a different one in the years before retirement.


  • Carrier-relationship value. Your current carrier's claims philosophy, defense panel quality, and responsiveness in the first 30 days of an incident only show up when you have a claim. Continuity has real value here, particularly mid-claim or after a recent claim closes.


None of these is a reason never to reshop. They're inputs your broker should weigh against the savings and coverage quality on the other side.



When should you reshop your medical malpractice insurance policy?


It can be worth re-shopping when at least one of the following is true:


  • Your renewal increase is materially above market. A useful rule of thumb: a renewal increase above 10% is worth investigating if peers in your specialty and state are seeing flat to mid-single-digit increases. If you don't know what peers are seeing, our medical malpractice market article summarizes current rate trends.


  • Your state of practice changed. Some carriers don't write in every state and pricing and coverage forms vary state by state. A move that crosses a state line is a reason to test the market regardless of your current premium.


  • Your specialty or scope changed. If you started doing procedures you weren't before, added an interventional sub-practice, or shifted from outpatient to inpatient, your current carrier may not be the most competitive on the new classification.


  • You added side gig work your current policy doesn't cover well. Telehealth across state lines, locum, expert witness work, and 1099 moonlighting often fall outside group or employer policies. A reshop here may be less about the primary policy and more about finding a carrier whose form fits the additional work.


  • You received a non-renewal notice. This isn't a reshop decision; it's a forced search. Move quickly. Non-standard markets fill the gap if standard markets won't quote.


  • You had a claim filed or paid in the last cycle. Reshop carefully here. Most carriers will quote conservatively or decline with an open claim, but it's worth knowing the market response, both for benchmarking and for confirming your current carrier's renewal pricing is reasonable given your file.


  • Your carrier's financial rating was downgraded. Below A- on AM Best is a yellow flag. A sustained or recent downgrade is worth attention. Your carrier needs to be solvent in year four of a claim, not just on the day they bound your policy.


A useful framing for the everyday case in between: even when none of the above is loudly true, an annual market check (a benchmark quote rather than a full reshop) gives you a data point to walk into the renewal conversation with. Many carriers will sharpen their offer when you arrive with a competing number; in many years, that's the most valuable outcome.


Related PSG resource:



When does formally re-shopping have less upside?


There are two common situations where a full-market reshop is usually unnecessary, although a quick benchmark check from your broker is still worth doing:


  • You're mid-claim or had a recent claim. Switching carriers during an active claim is very challenging and often not feasible. The new carrier won't take on the open file (it stays with the carrier in force when it was reported), and many carriers won't quote a new policy while one of yours is open. Even after resolution, continuity matters. The in-house defense team that already knows your case is an asset, not just a vendor. Our partners at Docshield recommend waiting at least one full renewal cycle after a claim closes before testing the market, and being honest with prospective carriers about the recent history when you do.


  • You're 1–5 years from retirement. This is the most expensive moment to switch carriers, and the one most often missed. Most claims-made carriers offer a free tail at retirement if you meet their qualifying conditions: typically age 55 or older with a minimum of 5+ years of continuous coverage with that carrier. Switching carriers inside the qualifying window forfeits the benefit, and the tail you'd otherwise have received free can land in the range of 150–200% of your mature claims-made premium.



Driving a successful reassessment of your malpractice coverage


A few things separate a successful re-shop from a wasted one. The common thread is the broker. Look for one who:


  • Knows medical malpractice specifically. Med mal is a different animal from other commercial P&C lines and requires its own set of carrier relationships and underwriting expertise.


  • Pulls your documentation for you. A good broker handles the paperwork — loss runs, declarations page, CV, board certifications, etc. — so you're not chasing carriers and forms yourself.


  • Is independent and has multi-carrier access. A broker with appointments across the market can drive carriers to bid against each other on your file.


  • Compares apples to apples. Premium is one variable. Defense treatment, retroactive date, consent-to-settle, tail terms, and per-claim and aggregate limits all matter at least as much. A good comparison shows all of them side by side.


  • Takes strong quotes back to your incumbent. Even if you ultimately stay, a competing quote in hand often gets your current carrier to sharpen their offer or improve terms.


Before binding any new policy, read the policy form (not just the marketing summary). Coverage forms differ between carriers in ways that don't show up on a side-by-side. If the form isn't available, ask.


If you're moving carriers, replacement coverage must be in force by the renewal date. A coverage gap, even 24 hours, can disqualify you from prior-acts coverage on the next policy and leave any claim filed during the gap uninsured.


If you're approaching renewal of a malpractice policy, a useful starting question for your broker is: what's my premium trend over the last three years, and how does it compare to peers in my specialty and state? A broker who works closely with med mal carriers can usually answer this from their live carrier data without putting your file out for full underwriting, and the answer, along with those factors mentioned below, tells you whether the renewal in front of you reflects the market or the carrier.



Conclusion

Though continuity of malpractice coverage has some benefits, both in terms of saving time and energy as well as some carrier perks, it may not be the best for saving money or making sure that your coverage is perfect for the situation you are in now. As the medical malpractice landscape evolves, it's especially important that physicians consider reshopping their policies when it comes time to renew. The factors mentioned above list when it might be a good idea to reshop your medical malpractice policy, based on when you are most likely to have a favorable outcome by doing so.




Additional malpractice insurance resources for physicians


Reshop your coverage with our partnered medical malpractice insurance brokers.


Sign up for our weekly PSG newsletter for alerts on new educational content, free webinars, and more.


Related PSG resources:



Sources


bottom of page